A new proposal to charge entry fees for New Zealand’s most popular natural attractions is sparking debate.
The Department of Conservation (DOC) has asked the public to weigh in on who should pay and how the funds should be used. While some see it as a way to support infrastructure, others worry about rising costs for tourists and locals.
Ruapehu Mayor Weston Kirton supports the idea if the money improves facilities like toilets and camping areas. He noted that areas like Mount Ruapehu are struggling to handle large numbers of visitors, with up to 200,000 tourists a year causing wear and tear. However, he emphasised that locals should retain free access.
Stewart Island Flights owner Bill Moffat strongly opposes the plan, citing existing costs, including a $10 visitor levy and a $100 international tourist tax. “It’s like triple dipping,” he argued, suggesting that visitors already contribute significantly to conservation funding.
Tourism Industry Aotearoa CEO Rebecca Ingram urged caution, highlighting the need to balance conservation funding with affordability for visitors. Some tourists, like Phaidra from Belgium, expressed concerns about how added fees might affect their travel plans. Others, like Liam from the U.S., supported fees if they directly benefit conservation, suggesting options like annual passes.
New Zealanders also have mixed views. Some, like Ben and Neil, believe user fees are fair if funds improve facilities. Others, like Amelia, oppose any charges, arguing that parks should remain free for everyone. Consultation on the plan ends in February 2025, with the government seeking to find a balance between preserving natural treasures and maintaining accessibility.
